Question 1

Which crypto cashback card actually pays out the most in a year?

Accepted Answer

It depends entirely on your spend profile, not the headline percentage on the card's landing page. A card advertising 5% cashback can lose to a 1.5% card once you subtract its annual fee, foreign exchange fee on travel spend, and the conversion spread charged when you fund purchases from a crypto balance instead of a stablecoin or fiat one. Crypto.com's top Obsidian tier pays 5% but requires roughly $450,000 in CRO staked for a year to unlock it, so for almost every real spender the mid-tier Ruby Steel or Royal Indigo levels, Gemini's category-based card, Coinbase Card's fee-free structure, or Nexo's Platinum tier will produce a higher net number. This calculator runs your actual annual spend, foreign-spend share and crypto-funded-spend share through all four cards' published rate structures at once so you can see net dollars, not marketing percentages.

Question 2

Why does the same card show a different net reward depending on my spend mix?

Accepted Answer

Because four of the calculator's cost lines scale with different slices of your spending, not the total. Cashback applies to your full annual spend. The foreign exchange fee only bites the share of spend you flagged as foreign-currency — someone who never travels pays it on $0. The conversion spread only bites the share of spend funded from a crypto balance rather than cash or a stablecoin — someone who always taps a linked bank account or USD balance pays it on $0 too. A subscription fee or CRO-staking opportunity cost is fixed regardless of spend. Two people with identical annual spend but different habits — one who travels a lot and pays with a crypto balance, one who spends only at home in fiat — can get opposite rankings from the same set of four cards, which is exactly why a single blended cashback percentage on a listicle is not enough to decide.

Question 3

What is the CRO-staking opportunity cost line and why does it matter for Crypto.com's higher tiers?

Accepted Answer

Crypto.com's Rose Gold and Obsidian tiers waive the monthly subscription fee in exchange for locking a large CRO balance — roughly $4,860 and $486,000 respectively at current published terms — for a 12-month staking period. That locked capital is not available to earn yield anywhere else for a year, which is a real cost even though no invoice ever gets sent. This calculator lets you set an assumed forgone annual yield (default 4%, a conservative stablecoin/savings benchmark) and multiplies it by the locked amount to turn that opportunity cost into a dollar figure subtracted from the card's net reward, the same way it subtracts a subscription fee for the lower tiers. Set it to 0% if you would not have put that capital to work elsewhere anyway.

Question 4

How is the breakeven spend between two cards calculated?

Accepted Answer

Every card's net annual reward is a straight line in your annual spend once your foreign-spend share and crypto-funded-spend share are fixed: reward = (effective rate) × spend + (perks − fee − staking opportunity cost). Two cards' lines cross at exactly one spend level, found by setting the two equations equal and solving for spend. Below that crossing point the card with the better fixed side (lower fee, more perks, less locked capital) wins even though its percentage rate may be lower; above it, the card with the higher effective percentage rate wins because the fee difference gets diluted across more spend. The calculator solves this automatically for your top two cards and reports the exact dollar spend level where the ranking flips.

クリプトカードキャッシュバック計算機

カード比較

仕組み

比較を読む