Risk amount ($)
β€”
Position size (units)
β€”
Notional value: β€”

Why size from risk

Survivors decide size from how much they can lose, not how much they want to win. The formula: units = (account Γ— risk%) Γ· (entry βˆ’ stop). Risk 1% per trade and a losing streak barely dents you; risk 20% and two bad trades end the account. Pair this with the liquidation calculator so your stop sits well before liquidation, and the PnL calculator to check the reward is worth the risk. Not sure where to put the stop? Let the market decide with the volatility (ATR) position size calculator.

Share: 𝕏 Post Reddit

Position sizing is the only thing that separates accounts that survive from ones that don't

The formula itself takes five seconds. Risk amount Γ· (entry βˆ’ stop) = units to buy. What takes longer is actually following it when you're convinced the trade is a sure thing.

Standard practice is 1–2% of account per trade. At 1% on a $1,000 account you're risking $10. With a stop 2% below entry on 10x leverage, safe collateral is $10 Γ· (0.02 Γ— 10) = $50. Most beginners would put in $200–300 because "it looks good." That's the difference.

Leverage changes notional, not risk β€” if you use 10x on $50 collateral your position is $500 notional. The stop needs to sit where it's technically valid, not where it keeps your loss small. Set the stop first, then calculate size.

The leverage figure above is just what your risk-sized notional implies β€” flexible per-position leverage tiers make it easier to hit that exact number instead of rounding up:

Related: stop-loss / take-profit calculator, risk/reward ratio, max leverage for drawdown.

Martingale RiskRevenge TradingDrawdown RecoveryCopy Trading RiskLosing Streak Simulator