Crypto Bridge Cost Comparator

Compare cross-chain bridge fees, speeds, and supported chains. Find the cheapest route for your transfer.

Bridge Fee Estimator

Nominal fee alone doesn't tell the whole story: bridges have accounted for roughly 40% of all Web3 exploit losses since 2022 ($2B+), so a "cheap" bridge with a thinner security track record can end up costing far more in expected risk than a slightly pricier, well-audited one. Toggle "Rank By" below to see both numbers side by side.

Bridge Comparison — Features

BridgeModelLiquidityCanonicalAuditRisk Tier*
StargateLiquidity pools$200M+Yes (USDC/USDT)✅ MultipleTier 1 · Low
AcrossOptimistic$100M+Yes (USDC)✅ MultipleTier 1 · Low
Hop ProtocolhToken + AMM$80M+No✅ MultipleTier 2 · Low-Med
Orbiter FinanceMaker/Taker$30M+No✅ 1Tier 4 · Med-High
deBridgeOracle + Liquidity$50M+Yes✅ MultipleTier 3 · Medium
SynapseLiquidity pools$60M+No✅ MultipleTier 3 · Medium

* Illustrative risk tier — see methodology below. Not an audited actuarial rating.

Risk-Adjusted Cost — Methodology & Limitations

Bridges have been the single biggest source of Web3 exploit losses since 2022 — roughly 40% of the $2B+ total — and it's not a historical problem: Kelp DAO's LayerZero-adapter exploit in April 2026 alone lost $280–293M. A bridge's nominal fee says nothing about that risk, so this calculator adds two extra cost components:

Limitations: the risk tiers above are illustrative, relative estimates for comparing bridges against each other — they are not audited actuarial data, insurance pricing, or a guarantee of safety. Bridge security changes over time (new audits, new exploits, TVL shifts). Before moving a large amount, check the bridge's current audit reports, incident history and bug-bounty status yourself rather than relying solely on this tool.

Bridge Safety Tips