If you had invested $1,000 on the same date — who won? Historical returns from multiple entry points.
| Date | BTC | ETH | SOL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2020 | $7,200 | $130 | $0.51 |
| Jan 2021 | $29,000 | $735 | $1.90 |
| Jan 2022 (top era) | $47,000 | $3,700 | $150 |
| Nov 2022 (FTX) | $16,000 | $1,100 | $13 |
| Jan 2023 | $16,600 | $1,200 | $10 |
| Jan 2024 | $43,000 | $2,280 | $102 |
| Apr 2024 (halving) | $63,800 | $3,100 | $180 |
| Jul 2026 (now) | loading… | loading… | loading… |
This tool compares the returns of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana over a chosen period so you can see how the three have performed relative to each other. It helps users weigh how these major assets have moved rather than viewing each in isolation.
It measures each asset's percentage change from a common starting point, letting you line up the three on the same basis. Comparing normalized returns rather than raw prices makes it clear which asset gained or lost more over the same window, regardless of their very different price levels.
You measure percentage change from a shared starting point rather than comparing absolute prices, since a coin priced in the thousands and one priced in the hundreds can still be compared fairly by percent gained or lost. This is often called normalizing or rebasing the returns.
These major assets are correlated and often trend in the same broad direction, especially during strong market-wide moves. However, they can diverge over shorter periods based on their own developments, so relative performance varies.
No, one asset leading over a given window does not mean it will keep leading, as leadership rotates between assets over time. Comparing past performance describes what happened, not what will happen next.